
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Cosmos 2nd round?</title>
<link>https://network.asa3.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1038938</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 23:53:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Dec 2014 12:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2014 American Scientific Affiliation</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://network.asa3.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1038938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Cosmos 2nd round?</title>
<link>https://network.asa3.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1038938</link>
<guid>https://network.asa3.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1038938</guid>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There seems to be some serious talk about another Cosmos series with Neil Tyson:</p><p>http://www.universetoday.com/116993/cosmos-tv-show-could-come-back-for-a-second-season/#more-116993</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Assuming the 3 million viewers per week for the last series, perhaps it would be helpful if they could get some assistance from us to avoid some of the more atheistic-friendly claims made in regards to the church's actions against Galileo and Bruno. &nbsp;Perhaps they are done with this sort of history, however.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I enjoyed the special Cosmos comments posted here in ASA following each presentation, but how nice it would be if they would make use of the great knowledge of many of our members and &nbsp;possibly avoid any unnecessary conflict.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 4 Dec 2014 19:25:49 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title></title>
<link>https://network.asa3.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1039777</link>
<guid>https://network.asa3.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1039777</guid>
<description><![CDATA[I agree, and wonder if in a second round Cosmos might even briefly examine the current state of science and faith discussion, and perhaps recognize some of the work being done (e.g., the CTNS volumes per the Vatican, Zygon journal, etc.) and the people doing it (e.g., Polkinghorne, Murphy, Van Till, etc.). Perhaps a well-worded letter to Tyson might encourage him to investigate?]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
