Print Page   |   Contact Us   |   Sign In   |   Join ASA or sign up
Sign In


Forgot your password?

Haven't registered yet?

Calendar

6/22/2015 » 7/3/2015
Fundamental Practices for Intellectual Humility, Grand Rapids, MI

6/30/2015 » 7/2/2015
Evolution & Christian Faith, Grand Rapids, MI

7/5/2015 » 7/10/2015
“Science or Religion: Do We Have to Choose?” Cambridge, England

7/12/2015 » 7/31/2015
America and China: 150 Years of Aspirations and Encounters, Grand Rapids, MI

7/17/2015 » 7/18/2015
“Science and Personal Action: Human & Divine,” Cambridge MA

CWIS: Christian Women in Science
Group HomeGroup Home Blog Home Group Blogs
CWIS is an affiliate of the American Scientific Affiliation and is open to all interested Christian Women in Science.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: Ruth Bancewicz  CWIS  Lynn Billman  STEM  Karen McReynolds  science education  astronomy  Biblical Anthropology  Biology  Jennifer Wiseman  ASA  CWIS Board  Mary Anning  physics  Ada Lovelace  Alice C. Linsley  American Association for the Advancement of Scienc  Amy Julia Becker  Amy Simpson  Anges Giberne  Archaeology  Arden Wells  as  Bible  chemistry  Christa Koval  climate change  computers  CWIS goals  CWIS logo 

Notes from Ms. Frizzle

Posted By Alice C. Linsley, Tuesday, June 30, 2015

 

Karen McReynolds


That Poor Crap

I teach science to college students who are not very interested in science. This can be challenging - more so than I would like at times.  Most of the time, students land in my biology or earth science class so they can meet the general education requirements of our liberal arts Christian university and never have to learn anything about living things or the earth again.  While these are not ideal circumstances for teaching science, I do the best I can.  Because of His goodness and His love for the world and its creatures, God blesses my efforts.  He also rewards me with occasional moments of outrageous laughter.

Toward the end of the last semester, when our visit to the Ocean Institute fell through at the last minute, I assigned students to do some internet sleuthing and find three lengthy videos about various aspects of the ocean. They were to watch each of them and evaluate them according to content and educational value.  One student turned in the following paragraph as part of her assignment.  I rewrite it here verbatim.

The second critter of the sea is a creature called the “Manta Shrimp”, these shrimp are bright in color and are extremely powerful for their small size. At one point in the video you see a crap run for cover under a glass, for most creatures this would make the crap safe, however not for the Manta Shrimp. This creature has arms or extensions that come out from the base of his body and have the power to hit something at the same strength as a 22 round bullet. That poor crap didn’t have a chance, not only did the Manta Shrimp break the glass it was able to break the crab’s shell with one swing.

In case you were wondering, I do have the student’s permission to use this. I happened to see her after the semester ended and I pointed out this particular paragraph to her. We both had a good laugh over it; she is a good sport. A better sport than writer, perhaps, but it is undeniable that she learned something about ocean life from this assignment. She also improved her understanding of the complexity and wonder of nature, and genuinely speaks differently now than she did at the start of the semester about the natural world.  If this is the result of my teaching efforts, I guess I can take a little crap along the way.

 

Related: 

Notes from Ms. Frizzle (Reflection on life, nature and death)

Notes from Ms. Frizzle (Reflection on Nat. Science Teachers Association conference)

Notes from Ms. Frizzle (Zacchaeus and the Monkey Swing Tree)

Notes from Ms. Frizzle (Close Encounter with a Bimac)

 

 

Tags:  Karen McReynolds 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Prayer for the 2015 ASA Annual Meeting

Posted By Alice C. Linsley, Wednesday, June 10, 2015

 

Christ's Chapel at Oral Roberts University


It is not too late to register for the ASA Annual Meeting at Oral Roberts University in Tulsa, OK from July 24-27, 2015. This promises to be a good conference and a place to connect and reconnect.


Register by June 15 to get the early bird discount. You may view the various sessions here.

Stimulating plenary speakers include: Alister McGrath, Amos Yong, Esther Meek and Bethany Sollereder

There will be more than 50 contributed papers, dynamic fellowship, rousing volleyball games, and much more.


Here is a prayer that CWIS members might pray for the upcoming annual conference:

Almighty and eternal God, whose will it is that all should come to you through your Son Jesus Christ: Inspire our witness as people of science, that we might make known the power of his forgiveness and the hope of his resurrection.

We beseech you to be with us as we gather and as we depart. Keep us safe from all harm.

While we are together grant us grace to serve one another, to listen to one another, and to encourage one another. May we drink from the fountain of wisdom, which is your Word and Christ our Lord. 

For the women who attend, we ask a special blessing. Grant opportunities for all to make some good connections and to form new friendships, and that we will grow together and share a united sense of our purpose.

Gracious Lord, you have filled the world with beauty. Open our eyes to behold your gracious hand in all your works; that we may learn to serve you and all humanity with gladness; for the sake of him through whom all things were created and are sustained, Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.


 

Tags:  prayer 

Share |
PermalinkComments (1)
 

Geek Mommies of Princeton

Posted By Alice C. Linsley, Saturday, May 16, 2015

 

Alice C. Linsley


I recently visited my daughter to meet my new grandson, Sebastian (shown below). My daughter lives near Princeton, New Jersey, and is a member of an unusual group.


The Geek Mommies of Princeton has about 40 members and the only criteria for membership is that you be a mother and curious about the world. The young mothers get together monthly to inquire, question, explore, and share their thoughts about child care and how to encourage their children in STEM.


Monthly activities include potlucks, children's book exchanges, afternoon tea at the Buck's County Children's Museum, and science experiments. The children have learned about propulsion, making a volcano, and painting with spices and teas.


There is also a weekly play date with about 5 regular participants.


Mothers also read and discuss science fiction, fantasy, biographies and articles on sustainable living.


This group can serve as a model for other similar groups in which children are nurtured in an environment of inquisitive exploration and play.

 


This post has not been tagged.

Share |
PermalinkComments (2)
 

Remembering Rosalind Franklin

Posted By Alice C. Linsley, Saturday, May 09, 2015

 

Rosalind Franklin was a brilliant X-ray crystallographer whose photograph of a fiber of DNA was critical to James Watson and Francis Crick's discovery of the double helix.


Rosalind Elsie Franklin was born in London, England. Her family was well-to-do and both sides were very involved in social and public works. Franklin's father wanted to be a scientist, but World War I cut short his education and he became a college teacher instead. Rosalind Franklin was extremely intelligent and she knew by the age of 15 that she wanted to be a scientist. Her father actively discouraged her interest since it was very difficult for women to have such a career. However, with her excellent education from St. Paul's Girls' School? one of the few institutions at the time that taught physics and chemistry to girls ? Franklin entered Cambridge University in 1938 to study chemistry.

When she graduated, Franklin was awarded a research scholarship to do graduate work. She spent a year in R.G.W. Norrish's lab without great success. Norrish recognized Franklin's potential but he was not very encouraging or supportive toward his female student. When offered the position as an assistant research officer at the British Coal Utilization Research Association (CURA), Franklin gave up her fellowship and took the job.

 

Read it all here.

Go here for the Rosalind Franklin Collection of Papers


Tags:  genetics 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Pink Science? Letters to the Editor

Posted By Alice C. Linsley, Saturday, May 09, 2015

What follows is one of a series of letters to the NYT Editor pertaining to engineering careers for women. Read the other letters here.


"How to Attract Female Engineers,” by Lina Nilsson (Op-Ed, April 27), seems appealing at first glance. But by proposing that women focus on work that is "societally meaningful” and that supports "humanitarian” goals, Ms. Nilsson indulges in two fallacies.

One is the premise that women are attracted to work consistent with the cultural notion that these are appropriate roles for women (traditionally, nursing and teaching).

In some sense, she is advocating "pink science” while ignoring the large number of female mathematicians, physical scientists and engineers who find the subject matter itself attractive.

It is analogous to telling women in medical school that they should become pediatricians and ob-gyns rather than neurosurgeons.

The other fallacy is that women are so shortsighted as to see only projects directly aimed at improving "the lives of people living in poverty” as having a meaningful societal effect. Surely, we all have a vested interest in enterprises like designing bridges and airplanes that are structurally sound.

We need to move forward with more female scientists in all fields rather than relegate them to certain subspecialties and pretend that such work is more valuable to our society.

MARY BETH RUSKAI

Arlington, Mass.

 

Tags:  Engineering 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

NPR on The Hubble Space Telescope

Posted By Alice C. Linsley, Sunday, April 26, 2015

 

Hubble has put several billion miles on its odometer, and, as with any high-mileage vehicle, things go wrong. An onboard computer froze in October of last year, briefly shutting down the whole telescope. But today, it's running smoothly. And that's good news, says Jennifer Wiseman, Hubble's senior scientist.

"We're doing everything from looking at objects in the Solar System — trying to understand, for example, Jupiter — to looking at things far beyond our solar system," Wiseman says. "We're even studying some of the most distant galaxies ever detected."

The telescope is in more popular than ever, Wiseman says. This year, astronomers have written more than a thousand proposals for how to use Hubble. That demand is partly because of upgrades done by astronauts like Massimino. But the main appeal is its location.

Read the whole NPR story here.


Tags:  as  Jennifer Wiseman 

Share |
PermalinkComments (1)
 

Caring For God's World

Posted By Alice C. Linsley, Friday, March 20, 2015

 

Ruth Bancewicz


Could a Biblical understanding of our relationship with nature be the key to effective and purposeful conservation? As part of this current series of guest posts, Steph Bryant, coordinator of the God and the Big Bang project, writes about the relationship between human beings and the planet. She considers the damage we have done, and whether there is any place for hope as we explore ways to remedy the situation and better care for the world around us.

For as long as I can remember I’ve been enthralled by animals. This fascination has steadily grown into a love for scientific knowledge, which helps me to understand the natural world. It was of very little surprise to anyone who knew me that I found myself studying Natural Sciences at the University of Cambridge, specialising in zoology and focussing my final year studies on ecology and conservation science. For me, an appreciation of the natural world leads naturally to concern over its destruction and how we might remedy the situation. But how does that fit with being a person of faith? As a Christian, where do I see purpose in conservation science or ecology? Where do I see hope in a discipline often tinged with despair?

© Steph Bryant

Conservation science is, for me, an act of seeking to obey God’s commands. Genesis 1says that God created man to ‘rule over’ creation. If, as Psalm 24 states, ‘the Earth is the Lord’s’, why would we allow our ‘rule’ to be characterised by irresponsible, destructive and exploitative practices? Surely, instead we should try to reflect God’s great and awesome love for all of creation through work that is characterised by love and responsibility.

A responsible rule would be one which benefits the natural world. But it is also an effective way to care for other humans: to seek to ‘love your neighbour’ (Matthew 22:34-40). As much as we pride ourselves on our technological advancements and the distance we have put between ourselves and our ‘caveman’ roots, we still depend almost entirely upon healthy, functioning ecosystems for our survival. We need wetlands to buffer our cities from storms and floods; animals, namely insects, to act as pollinators or pest control for many of our food crops; forests to protect areas from erosion and catastrophic landslides; healthy oceans to provide us with much of the fish we eat… The list is endless. It is particularly important for us to acknowledge this if we are to love and help not only the world around us but also the most vulnerable, struggling and impoverished of nations: people who often directly rely on these so-called ‘ecosystem services’ for their livelihoods.

salamander
© Steph Bryant

One of the biggest obstacles to conservation is outlined by Andrew Balmford, a Professor of conservation biology at the University of Cambridge, in his excellent book Wild Hope[i]. He asserts that the recent rapid urbanisation of human society (over half of us now spend our time living and working in towns and cities, indoors, online or travelling by car or train) is contributing to an ever increasing disconnect between humans and creation. Where does the water in my tap come from? What watershed area do I live in? What are the bird species I am most likely to see at this time of year? What phase is the moon in? Most of our answers to questions like these would indicate that we have, indeed, lost a great deal of our awareness of the natural world. This is a problem: how can we effectively help a world that we do not currently understand?

So a key purpose for conservation scientists is to study the natural world, ‘the works of the Lord’ and to help others understand them – to grow, and encourage others to grow, in knowledge and understanding and therefore in appreciation and love for creation. Last year I spent 9 months living in Canada. I was working with A Rocha, an international Christian organisation which – inspired by God’s love – engages in scientific research, environmental education and community based conservation projects. It is a pleasure to see the way that projects like this can cultivate understanding and kindle a desire to care for God’s world, inspiring us to use our power, creativity and intellect for the good of all who share this remarkable and awe-inspiring planet.

You can find out more about Steph’s adventures in Canada at thewanderingzoologist.

[i] Balmford, Andrew – ‘Wild Hope’ (The University of Chicago Press, 2012), Chapter 1 – The glass half empty pp. 1 – 17


Tags:  environment  Ruth Bancewicz 

Share |
PermalinkComments (1)
 

Janet Warren Explores "Feminine Sin"

Posted By Alice C. Linsley, Saturday, February 21, 2015
Updated: Saturday, February 21, 2015

 

E. Janet Warren


The words sin and science are seldom mentioned in the same sentence. However, I suspect that sin, both individual and societal, is a contributing factor to the fact that male scientists outnumber female ones. This suggestion is not intended to produce the guilt and shame that is already so common in women, but intended rather to illuminate an issue and perhaps guide strategies to change. The gender gap in science has been addressed primarily in feminist and sociological literature; there has been little discussion from a Christian perspective. In this presentation, I first review the literature on the gender gap in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM), and then summarize the biblical/theological literature on gender equality. I next turn to the biblical/theological concept of sin (typically construed as pride and arrogance, which tend to be associated with men) and discuss how considering so-called "feminine” sin (neglecting responsible dominion and undervaluing oneself) can contribute to both our understanding of and our response to the gender gap in STEM.

That is the Introduction to Janet Warren's paper Feminine Sin and Female Scientists published in the March 2015 issue of the American Scientist Affiliation (ASA) Journal.

Janet Warren in a Family Physician/Independent scholar in Hamilton, Ontario. She has been practising Family Medicine for 20 years, with a special interest in mental health care and counselling. She recently attained her PhD in Theology and published her thesis as Cleansing the Cosmos: A Biblical Model for Conceptualizing and Counteracting Evil. Her current research interests include the integration of psychology/neuroscience and theology. Janet has been involved with CSCA since 2011 and is excited to be part of the executive council. 

Janet holds multiple degrees:


BSC (McMaster University)
MD (University of Toronto)
MTS (Tyndale Seminary)
PHD (University of Birmingham

Janet Warren has written:

Strangely, Christian feminism, actually feminism in general, has never been a strong interest of mine. I would rather not argue the issue but simply and quietly get on with using my God-given gifts as best I can. Yet somehow the topic tends to jump in my path frequently, forcing me to address it. Strange. 

Now psychology and theology are interests of mine and I had been researching the complex topic of sin shortly prior to ASA 2014. This was in relation to my counseling practice as well as a course I taught on the integration of psychology and theology. I was intrigued by the concept of "masculine” and "feminine” sin and wondered how this could relate to the newly formed Christian Women in Science group. As a physician I had fortunately not encountered many limitations as a result of my gender. Although, strangely, years ago I wrote an article for Focus, the journal of the Canadian Christian Medical Dental Society, titled "I Ain't Gonna See No Woman Doctor” in which I pointed out some societal prejudices and unfair expectations of female physicians.

My research revealed that there is still a large gender gap in STEM fields, and I wondered if one contributing factor is the tendency in women to undervalue ourselves. Sadly, this tendency is sometimes reinforced in Christian teaching, under the guise of humility. And, also sadly, I have experienced more limitations of my gifts in churches than in my medical profession. But I plan to continue to use my gifts to serve God as best I can. In fact I recently presented a paper at a conference on evangelical feminism. Strangely, feminism is not a strong interest of mine... 

However, for those who may be interested in Christian feminism, I refer you to the organization "Christians for Biblical Equality” http://www.cbeinternational.org/ as well as a recent blog post by fellow CSCA/ASA member Patrick Franklinhttps://patrickfranklin.wordpress.com/ 

Tags:  E. Janet Warren 

Share |
PermalinkComments (1)
 

Ruth Bancewicz on Her New Book

Posted By Alice C. Linsley, Friday, February 13, 2015

 

What is it like to be a person of faith and a scientist? In a video interview the theologian and former biophysicist Alister McGrath commented that we need Christian scientists who are “prepared to enter into the public arena in debate, in comment, and in the writing of books showing how faith enriches their science.”
This blog has been one such attempt to show the positive effect of science on faith, and judging by the comments over the years, it has encouraged a number of people in that direction. On the 15th of this month, Monarch will publish my book God in the Lab: How Science Enhances Faith, which draws together these themes into a more coherent whole.
God in the Lab comes out of my enjoyment of science, my interest in hearing other scientists’ stories, and my desire to share the experience of working in a lab. It shows how creativity and imagination are vital to the practice of both science and Christianity. It looks at the ways in which beauty, wonder and awe can raise deeper questions about the world, and it gives six working scientists a voice in the science-faith arena.
GITL_mugshotsWhen I interviewed Harvey McMahon, Ruth Hogg, Jennifer Siggers, Jeff Hardin, Rhoda Hawkins and Bob Sluka, I asked them about their work and beliefs, how the two fit together, and how science enhances their faith. Alongside these conversations, I explored the literature on each topic, in both science and theology. Thankfully, when I married the two sets of material together and showed it to the scientists, they were happy with my portrayal of their life and the way in which I had woven together their comments with my gleanings from the library.
My aim in this project – the blog and book, my talks and other activities over the last three and a half years – was to start some new discussions. I wanted to bring to the fore some areas of human experience that we can all identify with, whatever our religious or educational background. I wanted to show that Christianity is not just complementary to science, but it can also be enhanced by our exploration of the world.
When I started working for Christians in Science back in 2004, I was encouraged by something that Oliver Barclay, former General Secretary of the University and Colleges Christian Fellowship, wrote to one of our committee members after a request for help in dealing with certain science-faith issues. He suggested that one of the things we focus on is the wonder of the world that science reveals.
A Swarm of Ancient StarsRegardless of our views on Genesis, or even the existence of a God, we can all identify with the sense of awe that hits us when we see something vast, beautiful or complex. The night sky, an ancient forest, microscopic organisms, or an equation – these all affect different people in different ways, but most of us will find something in nature or our exploration of it that is arresting and inspiring.
I deliberately finished God in the Lab with a chapter on awe because it leads most directly to questions of God for some, and worship for others. This is the part of the discussion on science and faith that often affects people most deeply. Some find a bleak world that we must find our way in, enjoying awe and wonder when we can. Others experience spirituality, and many encounter a personal God. My hope is that this book will start discussions that help us to hear each other, find points of common interest, and learn to appreciate the life of a scientist-believer.

Tags:  Ruth Bancewicz 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
 

Ruth Hogg: Reconciling Science and Faith

Posted By Alice C. Linsley, Tuesday, February 03, 2015

 

Ruth Bancewicz

 

What happens when two aspects of a person’s life seem miles apart? In this series of extracts from God in the Lab, Dr Ruth Hogg tells how she learned to reconcile her beliefs about God and her scientific work.

Ruth has always been interested in exploring the connection between science and faith. In Cambridge she was a founding member of the local Veritas Forum, running events to help students and faculty members to discuss – as the Veritas Forum website says – “life’s hardest questions and the modern relevance of Jesus Christ”.

While scientific evidence is important for some, many scientists actually find God outside of the lab: at home, at university, or later in life. Ruth is one of those who discovered God early on, though it was only as an adult that she realised faith and science can fit together.


© Ruth Hogg
© Ruth Hogg


Growing up in rural Northern Ireland, it was easy for Ruth to accept what she learned about God. “Faith was always part of the way my parents looked at life. Even at school, in my area where the majority of people still went to church, having God as part of your life was very common.” With this example, Ruth decided to become a Christian.

Later on, at high school and then university, Ruth came across people who didn’t believe in God. She heard arguments against Christianity that challenged her faith, but in a positive way. As she worked out answers to those questions and objections, her understanding grew. “Having made a commitment quite young, I did then gradually come to ‘own’ that decision more myself.”

One question remained, however. “I did have a very uneasy feeling about science and Christianity. It was like a Pandora’s Box that I was afraid to open, but I knew I had to.” This sense of uneasiness remained with Ruth until she spent time as a postdoc in Australia. “That was a time when my faith was probably tested the most, because I realised I was somewhere I could easily leave the whole thing behind if I wanted to. Various personal circumstances had also left me feeling a bit jaded about the goodness of God.”

Everything changed when Ruth joined a church in Melbourne. “I had the shock of being in a very evangelical Anglican congregation in Melbourne where I met a lot of people who were really passionate about their faith, yet science just wasn’t an issue for them.” Ruth was encouraged to read The Language of God by Francis Collins, the former Director of the Human Genome Project, who is also a Christian.

In this book Collins told of his personal journey from atheism to Christianity. The writing conveyed a fervent faith in Christ as well as a passion for science, which Ruth could identify with. It also included a helpful contrast between the three basic options for a Christian trying to make sense of the human origins issue, namely Young Earth Creationism, Intelligent Design and Theistic Evolution. Ruth had previously read the Intelligent Design literature and felt underwhelmed by its scientific rigor, but this was the first time she had encountered an argument for Theistic Evolution. She read more and more, and eventually became comfortable with the position.


Ruth is now based at Queen’s University, Belfast. © Paul Porter, freeimages.com
Ruth is now based at Queen’s University, Belfast.
© Paul Porter, freeimages.com


“It was so revolutionary to see that I could happily combine my passion for science with a renewed passion for my faith. It was just a huge relief that I didn’t have to live in denial.” Now, as the leader of a lab, Ruth has more confidence to be open about her faith. She is also able to fully enjoy the “Wow moments, when things fall into place and it’s hard not to get a feeling that you’re somehow seeing into the mind of God.”

To read more about Ruth Hogg’s work and faith, and the importance of creativity, imagination, beauty, wonder and awe in science, see God in the Lab: How Science Enhances Faith (Monarch, 2015). This article was republished with permission from Science and Faith.


 

Tags:  Ruth Bancewicz  Ruth Hogg 

Share |
PermalinkComments (1)
 
Page 1 of 8
1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  >   >>   >|